POSTED BY: Jim Ittenbach | December 11, 2009
The impact of text messaging on the decline of formal writing among teens has been debated in pedagogical circles ever since cell-phone ownership became an adolescent rite of passage in the mid-2000s.
But according to a University of Illinois expert in media literacy, not only are critics who argue that texting is synonymous with literary degradation wrong, but they also often overlook the bigger role that texting and its distant cousin, “tweeting,” could play in education and research.
Carol L. Tilley, a professor of library and information science at Illinois, says that schools and libraries should consider embracing texting and tweeting as a means of engagement rather than simply outlawing it.
“I think if you’re an educator or librarian looking for new ways of to reach out to teens and tweens, then texting is one possibility,” Tilley said. “Over 70 percent of teens have a cell phone, so I think it’s a viable alternate means of engaging with that age group.”
When used as a tool for ubiquitous learning, text messaging and tweeting wouldn’t be tools of distraction, but a means of engagement for this generation of gadget-obsessed teens.
“Teachers could send reminders about assignments, links to study guides or updates on their progress grading major projects by text or by tweet,” Tilley said. “If they’re away at a conference or need to use a sub for a day, they could use Twitter to stay in contact with their class without having to physically be there.”
Students could text reference questions to school librarians without having to ask for a hall pass or having to wait until lunch, Tilley said, and librarians might tweet about new materials added to their collections.
Good preparation for more formal writing
Texting and tweeting could be seen as continuing the tradition of play and economy in language, which Tilley argues is good preparation for more formal writing assignments – provided, of course, that the use of emoticons and text-speak don’t spill over into their final drafts.
“Young people learn about the importance not only of argumentation but also how to deliver a certain message to an audience, especially given the limitations of the medium itself,” she said. “From an educational standpoint, that helps students become more in tune with language.”
Tilley said that Twitter, the popular micro-blogging site that lets users tweet
text-based messages that can’t run longer than 140 characters, is actually easier to integrate into instruction than text messaging because “you can broadcast tweets to a wider audience than texts.”
“In terms of strategies for creative or critical writing, having a limited number of characters to work with opens up all sorts of cool ways to play with the medium,” she said.
For example, an English teacher could take a famous character from a novel and ask students to tweet from that character’s perspective.
“It’s a good way to get into the psychology of the character,” she said.
Teachers could also challenge students to craft micro-stories complete with a climax and a denouement in 140 characters. Tilley noted that the flash-fiction genre has a distinguished lineage: the famously laconic Ernest Hemingway once wrote a story using just six words – “For sale: baby shoes, never worn” – and is said to have called it his best work.
Tilley argues that most educators make the faulty assumption that text messaging and tweeting are akin to formal writing. According to a recent Pew survey, teens view texting not as writing or as a distraction from “real” communication, but on par with informal conversation.
Since texting can be thought of as closer to a dialogue than a formal piece of prose, Tilley said you can’t expect the same level of polish and grammatical correctness to texts or tweets.
Bans on devices are a losing battle
In their efforts to turn cell phones into contraband, Tilley said that teachers and librarians might be fighting a losing battle.
“Texting can be a lot more surreptitious than an actual phone call, where you have to hold the phone up and speak into the receiver,” Tilley said. “So just because you can’t have cell phones in a lot of schools and libraries doesn’t mean students won’t try to text on the sly.”
But there’s also the “cool” factor to consider: By the time teachers get around to bringing something new into the classroom, it’s already passé.
“There’s always that danger when embracing something in a school setting that you kill it for the students,” Tilley said. “But helping kids understand the social and contextual role that texting plays in their lives I think is one possible justification. If there are ways educators can incorporate it in providing homework support or building dialogue out of school hours, then I think it could be a useful communications tool.”